{"id":5466,"date":"2025-10-10T13:07:35","date_gmt":"2025-10-10T11:07:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.earth-nlp.com\/?p=5466"},"modified":"2025-10-10T13:07:35","modified_gmt":"2025-10-10T11:07:35","slug":"effect-of-mindfulness-based-stress-reduction-vs-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-or-usual-care-on-back-pain-and-functional-limitations-in-adults-with-chronic-low-back-pain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/2025\/10\/10\/effect-of-mindfulness-based-stress-reduction-vs-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-or-usual-care-on-back-pain-and-functional-limitations-in-adults-with-chronic-low-back-pain\/","title":{"rendered":"Effect of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy or Usual Care on Back Pain and Functional Limitations in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A Randomized Clinical Trial<\/span><\/h4>\n

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Daniel<\/b> C<\/b>.\u00a0Cherkin<\/b>, PhD, Karen<\/b> J<\/b>.\u00a0Sherman<\/b>, PhD, Benjamin<\/b> H<\/b>.\u00a0Balderson<\/b>, PhD<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
Abstract<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Importance<\/strong>\u00a0 Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has not been rigorously evaluated for young and middle-aged adults with chronic low back pain.<\/p>\n

Objective<\/strong>\u00a0 To evaluate the effectiveness for chronic low back pain of MBSR vs cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or usual care.<\/p>\n

Design, Setting, and Participants<\/strong>\u00a0 Randomized, interviewer-blind, clinical trial in an integrated health care system in Washington State of 342 adults aged 20 to 70 years with chronic low back pain enrolled between September 2012 and April 2014 and randomly assigned to receive MBSR (n\u2009=\u2009116), CBT (n\u2009=\u2009113), or usual care (n\u2009=\u2009113).<\/p>\n

Interventions<\/strong>\u00a0 CBT (training to change pain-related thoughts and behaviors) and MBSR (training in mindfulness meditation and yoga) were delivered in 8 weekly 2-hour groups. Usual care included whatever care participants received.<\/p>\n

Main Outcomes and Measures<\/strong>\u00a0 Coprimary outcomes were the percentages of participants with clinically meaningful (\u226530%) improvement from baseline in functional limitations (modified Roland Disability Questionnaire [RDQ]; range, 0-23) and in self-reported back pain bothersomeness (scale, 0-10) at 26 weeks. Outcomes were also assessed at 4, 8, and 52 weeks.<\/p>\n

Results<\/strong>\u00a0 There were 342 randomized participants, the mean (SD) [range] age was 49.3 (12.3) [20-70] years, 224 (65.7%) were women, mean duration of back pain was 7.3 years (range, 3 months-50 years), 123 (53.7%) attended 6 or more of the 8 sessions, 294 (86.0%) completed the study at 26 weeks, and 290 (84.8%) completed the study at 52 weeks. In intent-to-treat analyses at 26 weeks, the percentage of participants with clinically meaningful improvement on the RDQ was higher for those who received MBSR (60.5%) and CBT (57.7%) than for usual care (44.1%) (overall P<\/i>\u2009=\u2009.04; relative risk [RR] for MBSR vs usual care, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.06-1.77]; RR for MBSR vs CBT, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.18]; and RR for CBT vs usual care, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.01-1.69]). The percentage of participants with clinically meaningful improvement in pain bothersomeness at 26 weeks was 43.6% in the MBSR group and 44.9% in the CBT group, vs 26.6% in the usual care group (overall P<\/i>\u2009=\u2009.01; RR for MBSR vs usual care, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.15-2.34]; RR for MBSR vs CBT, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78-1.36]; and RR for CBT vs usual care, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.18-2.41]). Findings for MBSR persisted with little change at 52 weeks for both primary outcomes.<\/p>\n

Conclusions and Relevance<\/strong>\u00a0 Among adults with chronic low back pain, treatment with MBSR or CBT, compared with usual care, resulted in greater improvement in back pain and functional limitations at 26 weeks, with no significant differences in outcomes between MBSR and CBT. These findings suggest that MBSR may be an effective treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain.<\/p>\n

Trial Registration<\/strong>\u00a0 clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01467843<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/a>\n
\n
Introduction<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/a>\n

Low back pain is a leading cause of disability in the United States.1<\/a><\/sup> Despite numerous treatment options and greatly increased medical care resources devoted to this problem, the functional status of persons with back pain in the United States has deteriorated.2<\/a><\/sup>,3<\/a><\/sup> There is need for treatments with demonstrated effectiveness that are low risk and have potential for widespread availability.<\/p>\n<\/a>\n

<\/a>Psychosocial factors play important roles in pain and associated physical and psychosocial disability.4<\/a><\/sup> In fact, 4 of the 8 nonpharmacologic treatments recommended for persistent back pain include mind-body components.4<\/a><\/sup> One of these, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), has demonstrated effectiveness for various chronic pain conditions5<\/a><\/sup>–8<\/a><\/sup> and is widely recommended for patients with chronic low back pain. However, patient access to CBT is limited. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR),9<\/a><\/sup> another mind-body approach, focuses on increasing awareness and acceptance of moment-to-moment experiences including physical discomfort and difficult emotions. MBSR is becoming increasingly popular and available in the United States. Thus, if demonstrated as beneficial for chronic low back pain, MBSR could offer another psychosocial treatment option for the large number of US residents with this condition. MBSR and other mindfulness-based interventions have been recognized as helpful for a range of conditions including chronic pain.10<\/a><\/sup>–12<\/a><\/sup> However, only 1 large randomized clinical trial (RCT) has evaluated MBSR for chronic low back pain,13<\/a><\/sup> and that trial was limited to older adults.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/a>\n

This RCT compared MBSR with CBT and with usual care. We hypothesized that adults with chronic low back pain randomized to receive MBSR would show greater short- and long-term improvement in back pain\u2013related functional limitations, back pain bothersomeness, and other outcomes as compared with those randomized to usual care. We also hypothesized that MBSR would be superior to CBT because it includes yoga, which has been found to be effective in treating chronic low back pain.14<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n<\/a>\n

\u00a0<\/div>\n
\n
Methods<\/strong><\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Study Design, Setting, and Participants<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The Mind-Body Approaches to Pain (MAP) trial protocol has been previously published15<\/a> <\/sup> and is shown in Supplement 1<\/a>. The primary source of participants was Group Health, a large integrated health care system in Washington State. Letters describing the trial and inviting participation were mailed to Group Health members who met the electronic medical record inclusion\/exclusion criteria and to random samples of residents in communities served by Group Health. Individuals who responded to the invitations were screened and enrolled by telephone (Figure<\/a>). Potential participants were told that they would be randomized to receive one of \u201ctwo different widely-used pain self-management programs that have been found helpful for reducing pain and making it easier to carry out daily activities\u201d or to continued usual care plus $50. Those assigned to receive MBSR or CBT were not informed of their treatment allocation until they attended the first session. Participants were recruited from 6 cities in 10 separate waves.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

JAMA<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[289],"tags":[314,288,315,316,109,219,220,317,287],"class_list":["post-5466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pubblicazioni","tag-cognitive-behavioral-therapy","tag-dolore","tag-mindfulness-based","tag-pain","tag-psicologia","tag-psicoterapia","tag-psychology","tag-terapia-cognitivo-comportamentale","tag-terapia-del-dolore"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5466","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5466"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5466\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/earth-nlp.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}